Why was claim for damages caused by contaminated mink food unsuccessful in the case of: Ashington Piggeries Ltd v Christopher Hill Ltd [1972] AC 441?
A) The food had been made to the plaintiff's specifications.
B) The food still conformed to its description in spite of the contamination.
C) The defendant's were not responsible for the contamination.
D) None of the above.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: If a seller does not have title
Q2: When will a buyer of defective goods
Q4: When will the consumer guarantee as to
Q5: Under the Australian Consumer Law,who is a
Q6: Which of the following is NOT a
Q7: Which of the following factors have to
Q8: The Australian Consumer Law replaces the Sale
Q9: Why was the plaintiff successful in obtaining
Q10: Unless it can be otherwise inferred from
Q11: Under the Australian Consumer Law goods supplied
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents