Why was the conduct found not to be misleading and deceptive in McWilliam's Wines Pty Ltd v McDonald's System of Australia Pty Ltd [1980] ATPR 40-188?
A) The target audience of the conduct would not be misled into thinking there was a connection between the two products.
B) The conduct was found to be misleading and deceptive.
C) Merely causing consumers to wonder if the product is made by the same manufacturer is not sufficient.
D) The products were clearly labelled so there was nothing more the manufacturer could do.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q9: Under the Australian Consumer Law definition,a 'consumer'
Q10: In relation to 'conduct' under s 18
Q11: In which case did the court set
Q12: Allegations of a breach of a specific
Q13: Conduct by a corporation or person in
Q15: Why was the conduct found to be
Q16: Which of the following is NOT covered
Q17: Section 18 is not only available to
Q18: Explain the function of the Australian Consumer
Q19: Conduct that is misleading and deceptive under
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents