The decision in the case of: Tooth & Co v Laws (1888) 9 LR (NSW) 154 was based on the fact that:
A) the dealings of the secretary appeared to be within the scope of their authority even though they lacked actual authority.
B) the defendant's previous conduct in paying for the jewellery amounted to a representation of the agent's authority.
C) the defendant's failure to notify the suppliers of the sale of business prohibited him from denying that the purchasers were his agents.
D) buying and selling cars was a normal practice of that kind of business.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q25: An agent must always act in person
Q26: Agency is a contractual relationship.
Q27: Why was the firm held liable in
Q28: What do you think is the rationale
Q29: What constitutes a 'secret commission' received by
Q31: Which of the following best describes an
Q32: The notion of 'apparent authority' means that
Q33: When an agent negotiates a contract between
Q34: The decision in Australia and New Zealand
Q35: Agency is a fiduciary relationship.
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents