In Grant v Australian Knitting Mills [1936] AC 85,the manufacturer:
A) was liable to the customer based on criminal law.
B) was not liable to the customer for breach of an implied term in the contract.
C) was not liable because the customer had the opportunity to inspect the product.
D) was liable for breach of duty of care owed to the customer.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Which of the following statements about product
Q3: In what circumstances will a person giving
Q4: It is easier to take action against
Q5: In what circumstances will an employer be
Q6: In which case did the House of
Q7: Under the civil liability acts,a 'Good Samaritan'
Q8: There are no circumstances upon which an
Q9: In which case did the High Court
Q10: A person who suffers injury as a
Q11: A 'non-delegable' duty of care is:
A)less onerous
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents