The plaintiff in Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v Selfridge & Co Ltd [1915] AC 847 was unable to enforce the defendant's promise because:
A) the promise had been made to Dew & Co.
B) there was no privity of contract between Dunlop and Selfridge.
C) Dunlop had given Selfridge no consideration.
D) all of the above.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q27: Estoppel is based on an assumption of
Q28: Only a promise supported by consideration will
Q29: A moral consideration cannot amount to good
Q30: In which of the following cases was
Q31: Estoppel was rejected Easts Van Villages v
Q33: Why is consideration important in respect to
Q34: Explain what is meant by the expression
Q35: Which of the following is NOT an
Q36: When the doctrine of promissory estoppel is
Q37: Which of the following would NOT amount
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents