In an action against a CPA in a jurisdiction that follows the Ultramares doctrine, lack of privity is a viable defense provided the plaintiff:
A) is the client's creditor who sued the CPA for negligence.
B) can prove gross negligence.
C) violated the Securities Act of 1933.
D) violated the Securities Act of 1934.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q58: Matthews & Co., CPAs, issued an unqualified
Q59: Which of the following is an illustration
Q61: The preferred defense in third party suits
Q64: The principal issue to be resolved in
Q64: Three approaches to the application of the
Q66: The restatement of torts approach to the
Q88: Under common law, an individual or company
Q98: The major conclusion of the 1931 Ultramares
Q115: Although there is confusion caused by the
Q119: Under the Securities Act of 1933, the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents