You are working for the Environmental Protection Agency and researching the effect of a potentially toxic chemical in drinking water. There is no documented scientific evidence showing that the chemical is toxic, but many suspect it to be a health hazard. Using the precautionary principle, what would be a reasonable environmental policy?
A)Establish no regulations until there are conclusive scientific studies.
B)Set the acceptable levels of the chemical conservatively low, and keep them there unless future studies show that they can be safely raised.
C)Set the acceptable levels at the highest levels encountered, and keep them there unless future studies demonstrate negative health effects.
D)Caution individuals to use their own judgment in deciding whether to drink water from a potentially contaminated area.
E)Establish a contingency fund to handle insurance claims in the event that the chemical turns out to produce negative health effects.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Using the precautionary principle, it is important to err on the side of caution when it comes to potential health hazards, even in the absence of conclusive scientific evidence. Setting acceptable levels conservatively low and keeping them there until further studies can demonstrate the safety of higher levels would be a reasonable environmental policy. This approach prioritizes the health and safety of the public over potential economic or industrial interests.

You Are Working for the Environmental Protection Agency and Researching