Suppose that the maximum depth of visualization using a 3.5-MHz transducer is 14.2 cm. On the previous two tests, 3 months and 6 months earlier, it was 14.4 and 14.1 cm, respectively. These variations should be interpreted as
A) just barely tolerable performance.
B) normal variations inherent in the machine.
C) excessive variations, indicating that the machine requires immediate service.
D) normal variations inherent in the measurement process.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: A measure of the minimum spacing along
Q2: Maximum depth of visualization tests are performed
Q3: The maximum depth of visualization can indicate
Q4: Maximum depth of visualization is often limited
Q5: On the viewing monitor of a scanner,
Q7: A scan is done of a uniform
Q8: A measurement comparing the actual separation between
Q9: For the measurement described in question 7,
Q10: For which of the following tests would
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents