How do the rational basis and the quasi-suspect or heightened scrutiny standards of review differ?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The rational basis review is the most lenient form of judicial scrutiny, requiring only that a law be rationally related to a legitimate government interest. The quasi-suspect or heightened scrutiny standard is more stringent, requiring the government to show that the law serves an important governmental objective and is substantially related to achieving that objective. This makes it more challenging for the government to justify a law under the quasi-suspect standard than under the rational basis review.

How Do the Rational Basis and the Quasi-Suspect or Heightened