In Davis v. Baugh Industrial Contractors, the traditional common law rule prevented a party who accepted a completed construction project from later suing the contractor for flaws in construction that caused injury to others. In reviewing such a case, the Washington state high court held that the rule was not sensible in modern times and would be dropped. This is an example of how:
A) modern day values are changing
B) common law can adapt to changing circumstances
C) common law never changes
D) courts can never go against a precedent set in previous cases
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q230: The value of precedence in legal decisions
Q231: The doctrine of stare decisis is generally
Q232: In addition to judge-made common law, "law"
Q233: The official, public publications of case decisions
Q234: One of the major advantages of dispute
Q236: One of the major advantages of dispute
Q237: The practice of deciding court cases by
Q238: In Davis v. Baugh Industrial Contractors, the
Q239: A major advantages of the use of
Q240: Stare decisis creates a more just legal
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents