In Davis V

In Davis v.West,where Davis sued the receiver who was appointed to collect the money she owed Houston Reporting Service (HRS) ,the appeals court held that:

A) Davis did not have a case because the receiver was protected by derived judicial immunity
B) Davis did not have a case because the receiver was protected by diplomatic immunity
C) Davis did not have a case because the receiver was a judge
D) Davis did not have a case because the receiver was not court appointed
E) Davis had a case because the receiver was not protected by derived judicial immunity