In South-Central Timber Development v. Wunnicke, concerning federal and state regulation of Alaska timber processing, the Supreme Court held:
A) Congress may limit interstate commerce however it wishes
B) Congress may limit interstate commerce only with approval of the affected states
C) Congress may not regulate intrastate commerce, if the effect is "inherently uncompetitive"
D) Congress may burden interstate commerce, but states may not unless allowed by Congress
E) States may place substantial burdens on interstate commerce so long as it advances a "significant state interest"
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q206: In Hughes v. Oklahoma, Oklahoma law forbid
Q207: In Hughes v. Oklahoma, Oklahoma law forbid
Q208: In Hughes v. Oklahoma, Oklahoma law forbid
Q209: In Hughes v. Oklahoma, Oklahoma law forbid
Q210: In Hughes v. Oklahoma, Oklahoma law forbid
Q212: States may not copy federal regulations if:
A)
Q213: In Hughes v. Oklahoma, the Supreme Court
Q214: In Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona, concerned
Q215: According to the Supreme Court, a Maine
Q216: In Hughes v. Oklahoma, the Supreme Court
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents