South-Central Timber Development v. Wunnicke, concerning federal and state regulation of Alaska timber processing, shows that:
A) Congress may limit interstate commerce however it wishes
B) Congress may limit interstate commerce only with approval of the affected states
C) Congress may not regulate intrastate commerce, if the effect is "inherently uncompetitive"
D) Congress may burden interstate commerce, but states may not unless allowed by Congress
E) States may place substantial burdens on interstate commerce so long as it advances a "significant state interest"
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q216: In Hughes v. Oklahoma, the Supreme Court
Q217: In Hughes v. Oklahoma, Oklahoma law forbid
Q218: According to the Supreme Court, an Alabama
Q219: In Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona, concerning
Q220: In Hughes v. Oklahoma, Oklahoma law forbid
Q222: Congress may burden interstate commerce while states:
A)
Q223: Congress has the power to "lay and
Q224: The Constitution gives Congress the power to
Q225: Taxes raise revenues for the government. Taxes
Q226: The Constitution gives Congress the power to
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents