In Kelo v.City of New London,Conn. ,where the city forced people to sell their houses so there could be a new large project built,the Supreme Court held that the forced sale:
A) was legitimate as long as the city used the property for government purposes
B) violated the takings clause because the largest impact of the action fell on minorities
C) violated the takings clause because property owners were not paid fair market value
D) was legitimate if approved by the federal Department of Housing
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q228: In Kelo v.City of New London,Conn. ,where
Q348: Individuals are protected from self-incrimination by:
A) the
Q361: In Braswell v. U.S., the president and
Q364: The traditional primary use of the Fifth
Q365: "...nor shall private property be taken for
Q366: Under the Fifth Amendment, when can a
Q367: The Fifth Amendment includes:
A) the just compensation
Q370: Eminent domain is when:
A) private corporations take
Q371: Under the Fifth Amendment, when can a
Q373: "No person shall be...compelled in any criminal
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents