In Squish La Fish v.Thomco Specialty Products,involving an adhesive that did not work as hoped in product packaging,Squish La Fish sued the adhesive seller for negligent misrepresentation because:
A) Squish La Fish was the foreseeable user of Thomco's representations concerning the
Adhesive
B) Squish La Fish felt that Thomco gave false information about the adhesive's removability
C) Squish La Fish felt that it relied on Thomco's false information about the adhesive
D) all of the specific choices
E) none of the specific choices
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q162: A person has acted negligently if:
A) they
Q169: In Squish La Fish v. Thomco Specialty
Q170: In a case in which a doctor
Q175: A person has acted negligently if:
A) they
Q177: In Squish La Fish v. Thomco Specialty
Q182: In Squish La Fish v. Thomco Specialty
Q184: The term res ipsa loquitur means:
A) an
Q189: In a tort of negligence, causation is:
A)
Q193: Suppose a surgeon is sued for negligence
Q195: Cause in fact is established by:
A) evidence
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents