In James v.Bob Ross Buick,where a car dealership sent letters to customers over James's signature after he had been fired,the appeals court held that James had no suit for invasion of privacy because there were no damages since sending the letter cost him nothing.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

This statement is false. Invasion of privacy is a legal tort and does not require a showing of monetary damages to establish liability. The fact that the dealership used James's name without his permission can qualify as invasion of privacy.

In James V