In Lightle V

In Lightle v.Real Estate Commission,involving a real estate agent in a dispute over a house sale,the Alaska high court held that the claim of fraudulent misrepresentation against Lightle:

A) failed because Lightle only recommended the purchase of a particular house
B) failed because Lightle obtained no financial gain from the problem that occurred
C) failed because the plaintiff is a sophisticated purchaser who could evaluate the situation
D) was justified because Lightle used force to make the deal happen
E) none of the other choices