In Lightle v.Real Estate Commission,involving a real estate agent in a dispute over a house sale,the Alaska high court held that the claim of fraudulent misrepresentation against Lightle was justified because:

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Alaska high court held that the claim of fraudulent misrepresentation against Lightle was justified because he made a partial disclosure that failed to reveal facts that "might have affected the recipient's conduct in the transaction in hand." This means that Lightle deliberately withheld information that would have affected the other party's decision to buy the house, thereby committing fraud. Choices A, B, and D are not supported by the facts of the case.

In Lightle V