In Lightle V

In Lightle v.Real Estate Commission,involving a real estate agent in a dispute over a house sale,the Alaska high court held that the claim of fraudulent misrepresentation against Lightle was justified because:

A) Lightle wanted to buy the house and so misled other buyers
B) Lightle failed to tell the sellers that there were offers on the house
C) Lightle made racist remarks about the potential buyers
D Lightle made a full disclosure that revealed facts that "might have affected the recipient's conduct in the transaction in hand."
E) none of the other choices are correct