In MDM Group v.CX Reinsurance,CX refused to write ski season insurance policies and was sued by MDM for interference with prospective business.The appeals court held that CX:
A) was not liable for interference with prospective business because there was no third party
B) was liable for interference with prospective business because there was a third party
C) was liable as it prohibited MDM from continuing its relationships with clients
D) was liable as it induced MDM to develop business relationships that were suddenly cancelled
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q46: In MDM Group v.CX Reinsurance,after several years
Q51: In MDM Group v.CX Reinsurance,CX refused to
Q141: The law of product liability is primarily
Q142: Which tort is concerned with a business
Q147: The elements of the tort of intentional
Q149: In a case of intentional interference with
Q154: One well-known business torts is:
A) intentional interference
Q155: Meddling with another's business in an unreasonable
Q156: The law of product liability is primarily
Q158: The elements of the tort of interference
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents