In MacPherson v. Buick, where the wheel on a new Buick collapsed, causing the car to crash, injuring MacPherson, the court of appeals held MacPherson could sue:
A) Buick for negligence under contract law
B) Buick for negligence under tort law
C) Buick for strict liability under contract law
D) Buick for strict liability under tort law
E) the wheel maker, not Buick, for negligence in product construction
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q163: In MacPherson v. Buick, where the wheel
Q164: In MacPherson v. Buick, where the wheel
Q165: During the 19th century, parties injured by
Q166: The _ is primarily concerned with harms
Q167: Under the rule of caveat emptor, the
Q169: The term privity of contract refers to:
A)
Q170: In product liability law, privity refers to:
A)
Q171: During the 19th century, parties injured by
Q172: In MacPherson v. Buick, where the wheel
Q173: Under the rule of _, the producer
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents