In MacPherson v. Buick, where the wheel on a new Buick collapsed, causing the car to crash, injuring MacPherson, the court of appeals held that:

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In MacPherson v. Buick, the court held that Buick, the manufacturer, could be held liable for negligence to the end user (MacPherson) even though Buick did not manufacture the defective wheel and there was no privity of contract between Buick and MacPherson. This case established the principle that manufacturers owe a duty of care to the ultimate consumers of their products if the products are inherently dangerous and the manufacturers know, or should know, that the products could cause injury if defective. None of the provided choices accurately reflect the court's holding.

In MacPherson V