In MacPherson v. Buick, where the wheel on a new Buick collapsed, causing the car to crash, injuring MacPherson, the court of appeals held MacPherson could sue Buick because:

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court of appeals held that Buick could be held liable because, as a manufacturer of automobiles, it was responsible for the finished product. This established the principle of strict liability for manufacturers, meaning that they could be held responsible for harm caused by a product regardless of fault or negligence. The other options are not relevant to the court's reasoning in this case.

In MacPherson V