In MacPherson v. Buick, where the wheel on a new Buick collapsed, causing the car to crash, injuring MacPherson, the court of appeals held MacPherson could sue Buick because:
A) Buick was only a dealer of automobiles, but still was responsible for the finished product
B) Buick was a wealthy enough company to afford paying damages
C) Buick was liable because it advertised that the wheels were safe on every vehicle
D) MacPherson's injuries were life-threatening
E) none of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q167: Under the rule of caveat emptor, the
Q168: In MacPherson v. Buick, where the wheel
Q169: The term privity of contract refers to:
A)
Q170: In product liability law, privity refers to:
A)
Q171: During the 19th century, parties injured by
Q173: Under the rule of _, the producer
Q174: Under the rule of caveat emptor, the
Q175: Under the rule of _, the producer
Q176: For a contractual relationship, it is essential
Q177: Privity is:
A) an agreement to privacy
B) an
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents