In ASC Construction Equipment USA v.City Commercial Real Estate,where ASC cut
City out of a commission it believed it should have had in a construction deal,and the jury agreed,the appeals court found there was no tort of interference with a contract because ASC and City were already in a contractual relation.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The statement correctly describes the ruling in ASC Construction Equipment USA v. City Commercial Real Estate. The appeals court found that there was no tort of interference with a contract because ASC and City were already in a contractual relation, thus making interference with the contract impossible.

In ASC Construction Equipment USA V