In MDM Group v.CX Reinsurance,where CX quit writing ski season insurance,which causes MDM to lose insurance business it could have had,the court held CX not liable for interference with prospective advantage as it had no obligation to sell insurance.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The statement accurately reflects the holding in MDM Group v. CX Reinsurance. The court found that CX did not have a duty to continue selling ski season insurance and thus could not be held liable for interfering with MDM's prospective advantage.

In MDM Group V