In Brown V

In Brown v.Swett and Crawford of Texas,where Brown and Galtney were hired to run an insurance office for Swett,but Brown was later fired and sued for wrongful expulsion from a partnership,the appeals court held that:

A) Brown's partnership claims failed as a matter of law because he had no right to receive a share of the profits of the business
B) Brown's partnership claims were valid because he had a right to receive a share of the profits of the business
C) Brown's partnership claims were valid because he shared in the losses of the business
D) Brown's partnership claims were not valid because he had failed to fill out the proper paperwork when the partnership was established
E) Brown's partnership claims were valid,but his dishonest conduct invalidated them