In KCRoofing Center V

In K.C.Roofing Center v.On Top Roofing,Inc. ,where K.C.Roofing asked the courts to hold Nugent,the owner of On Top Roofing,a corporation which no longer existed,personally liable for the cost of roofing supplies sold to On Top Roofing while it existed,the appeals court held that:

A) Nugent was personally liable for the debts owed the plaintiffs because he was using corporate status to avoid debts to the plaintiff
B) Nugent was not personally liable for the debts owed the plaintiffs because On Top Roofing was a limited liability company
C) Nugent was not personally liable for the debts owed the plaintiffs because On Top Roofing no longer existed
D) Nugent was personally liable for the debts owed the plaintiffs because K.C.Roofing Center was also a limited liability company
E) Nugent was not personally liable for the debts owed the plaintiffs because the evidence did not support the three-part test for piercing the corporate veil