In Armstrong v.Food Lion,the Armstrongs were beaten by employees of a grocery store.They sued the store.The South Carolina high court held that the store was not liable because:
A) the employees were not acting within the scope of their employment or in furtherance of Food Lion's business when they attacked the Armstrongs
B) the employees were acting within the scope of their employment or in furtherance of Food Lion's business when the attacked they Armstrongs
C) the employees had only worked for Food Lion for 6 months when they attacked the Armstrongs
D) the employees had worked for Food Lion for more than 6 months when they attacked the Armstrongs
E) the employees were not servants of Food Lion when they attacked the Armstrongs
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q273: In Armstrong v.Food Lion,the Armstrongs were beaten
Q381: Employers may be liable for torts of
Q382: Jimmy must be at work no later
Q385: A factor courts may consider in determining
Q388: Which of the following is a factor
Q390: The principal is possibly liable for the
Q391: Compared to the United State, the European
Q392: If an agent or employee commits an
Q398: The rule of law imposing vicarious liability
Q400: The rule of law imposing vicarious liability
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents