Solved

In Burlington Industries V

Question 329

Multiple Choice

In Burlington Industries v. Ellerth, concerning the liability of a firm for discrimination that occurs in the workplace when an employee claimed she was subject to sexual harassment by her supervisor, but never reported the matter to superiors, the Supreme Court held that:


A) if it was quid pro quo harassment, not hostile work environment, then the firm is liable if the discrimination is proven
B) if it was hostile work environment, not quid pro quo harassment, then the firm is liable if the discrimination is proven
C) if it was either hostile work environment or quid pro quo harassment, then the firm is liable if the discrimination is proven
D) it does not matter whether it was hostile work environment or quid pro quo harassment, the firm is likely to be vicariously liable if it did not have an effective anti-harassment policy
E) none of the other choices

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions

Unlock this Answer For Free Now!

View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions

qr-code

Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks

upload documents

Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents