In Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders the Supreme Court noted that in a case where discrimination in the workplace is claimed, and the employee quits and claims constructive discharge for hostile environment:

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders, the Supreme Court did not specify such detailed requirements for an employee claiming constructive discharge due to a hostile work environment. Instead, the ruling focused on the broader principles of employer liability and the conditions under which a constructive discharge claim can be made, without mandating specific actions like remaining on the job, exhausting all options, or giving the employer a certain number of chances to make amends.

In Pennsylvania State Police V