In Telebrands v.FTC the FTC sued a company selling an electronic muscle simulation abdominal belt,which the FTC claimed did nothing,but the good looking models in the ads implied that people using the product would become slim.The appeals court held that:
A) Telebrand did nothing wrong because everyone knows that electronic muscle simulation is not a legitimate way to lose weight
B) Telebrands's compare and save strategy was not transferable to other products,which contributed to the court's decision to reverse the district court's order against the company
C) Telebrands's compare and save strategy was transferable to other products,which contributed to the court's decision to reverse the district court's order against the company
D) Telebrands's compare and save strategy was transferable to other products,which contributed to the court's decision to uphold the district court's order against the company
E) Telebrands's compare and save strategy was not transferable to other products,which contributed to the court's decision to uphold the district court's order against the company
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q166: In Telebrands v.FTC the FTC sued a
Q287: The FTC uses the _ to put
Q292: Gold Hair shampoo advertises that it is
Q293: An art gallery sells fake "authorized" Vincent
Q294: Which of the following is NOT an
Q296: A company mails consumers cards telling them
Q297: The FTC test for unfairness does not
Q307: The FTC sued the company that produces
Q308: A "trade regulation rule" issued by the
Q317: U-Haul sued a competitor, Jartran, for making
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents