According to W. D. Ross's theory
A) a prima facie obligation is absolute and can never be overridden.
B) what we should do in any specific set of circumstances will always be self-evident.
C) it would be wrong to lie to a murderer even to save the life of a friend.
D) we have various moral duties that can't be reduced to a single, overarching obligation.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Ross's theory proposes the existence of various moral duties, which he calls prima facie obligations, that can't be reduced to a single, overarching obligation. These duties can conflict with each other, and their relative importance depends on the circumstances of each case. Therefore, the theory rejects the idea of absolute or self-evident obligations and instead proposes a more nuanced approach to moral decision-making. Option A is incorrect because Ross's theory acknowledges the possibility of overriding prima facie obligations in some cases. Option B is incorrect because Ross's theory recognizes the complexity and contingency of moral reasoning, which may require careful reflection and evaluation of different duties. Option C is incorrect because Ross's theory would consider the moral implications of lying in different contexts and would not necessarily rule out lying to a murderer to save a friend's life, depending on the relative weight of different obligations.

According to W. D. Ross's Theory