In this case,an individual argues that they had to break the law in order to prevent a more significant harm from occurring.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The situation described, where an individual has broken the law in order to prevent a more significant harm, is a case of the legal defense of necessity. This defense argues that although the individual broke the law, it was justified to prevent a greater harm from occurring. This defense is typically used in cases where the harm prevented was immediate and the individual had no other legal options available to them.

In This Case,an Individual Argues That They Had to Break