In Mapp v.Ohio, the Court held that the search, given the context of the officer's observations, was reasonable and therefore, the search was committed legally.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Mapp v. Ohio, the Supreme Court held that evidence obtained from an illegal search and seizure could not be used in state law criminal prosecutions in state courts, establishing the exclusionary rule's application to state courts via the Fourteenth Amendment.

In Mapp VOhio, the Court Held That the Search, Given the Context