To a comparativist,which would be of more value: discovery of a correlation or discovery of a causal relationship? Why?
A) correlation, because it demonstrates empirically that two variables are related
B) causal relationship, because it describes a more concrete, specific relationship between two variables
C) correlation, because it is more valuable for quantitative research findings
D) neither, as both terms describe essentially the same relationship between two variables

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A causal relationship is more valuable to comparativists because it not only demonstrates that two variables are related, but also explains the nature of that relationship. This allows for a deeper understanding of the phenomenon being studied and can potentially inform policy recommendations. Correlation alone may only suggest a relationship and does not provide insight into the direction or cause of that relationship.

To a Comparativist,which Would Be of More Value: Discovery of a Correlation