The criminal courts confront a double bind with regard to victims. On the one hand, victims are valued for the cases they bring to the system; their misfortunes become the raw material of the court process. On the other hand, individual victims represent a potential source of irrationality in the process. The personal and often emotional involvement of victims in the crime experience can generate particular demands for case outcomes that have little to do with the public interest.
-Members of the courtroom workgroup know that the same individual may, at different times,

Question

The criminal courts confront a double bind with regard to victims. On the one hand, victims are valued for the cases they bring to the system; their misfortunes become the raw material of the court process.  On the other hand, individual victims represent a potential source of irrationality in the process. The personal and often emotional involvement of victims in the crime experience can generate particular demands for case outcomes that have little to do with the public interest.
-Members of the courtroom workgroup know that the same individual may, at different times,

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The option A is the best choice, which states that an individual can be a victim, a witness, and an offender at different times. This is possible because an individual's role in the courtroom workgroup can change based on the situation. For example, a person who was a victim of a crime may later become a witness in the case against the offender. Alternatively, a person who has committed a crime in the past may become a victim in a different case. Therefore, option A is the most accurate choice.

The Criminal Courts Confront a Double Bind with Regard to Victims