In the case Carrington v.Rash,the courts decided that
A)property ownership was unnecessary for revenue bond elections.
B)members of the military could enjoy the full rights of suffrage in Texas.
C)efforts to deny African Americans access to the primaries would be overturned.
D)annual registration was prohibited.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Carrington v. Rash, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that members of the military stationed in Texas could not be denied the right to vote in local elections based on a state constitutional provision. This decision affirmed the voting rights of military personnel, emphasizing that their service to the country should not preclude them from participating in its democratic processes.

In the Case Carrington V.Rash,the Courts Decided That