Rawls Inc.sued Nozick Ltd.in tort.The court awarded nominal damages.This means that
A) Nozick must have committed the tort of negligence.
B) the court calculated the amount of damages for the primary purpose of deterrence.
C) Nozick must have committed an equitable wrong rather than a legal wrong.
D) Rawls did not prove that it suffered an actual loss as a result of Nozick's tort.
E) Nozick must have committed the tort of defamation.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q44: Case Brief 3.2 discusses the Supreme Court
Q45: Ethical Perspective 3.1 discussed the Supreme Court
Q46: Gold Star Investment Inc.is in the business
Q47: Jojo suffered a catastrophic injury while she
Q48: Pierre has just won a court case
Q50: Klaus purposefully sneaks onto Kelly's property without
Q50: Which of the following torts fall within
Q52: Teach Inc.sold a computer consulting business to
Q53: As a result of dumping toxic materials
Q54: Max worked in a warehouse owned by
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents