Fabrizio works at the Silk Nights Lingerie Shop in Polo Park Shopping Mall in Winnipeg.Despite being the store's leader in sales,he was not Silk Nights's most highly paid employee.In an effort to draw public support for his demand for higher wages,Fabrizio staged a picket inside of the mall when he was not working.Susana,who is employed by the mall as a security guard,was directed to remove Fabrizio from the premises.When he refused to leave voluntarily,she firmly took hold of his arm and led him out onto the street.Which of the following statements is TRUE?
A) Susana is liable for the tort of battery.
B) Susana was entitled to use reasonable force to remove Fabrizio from the premises.
C) Fabrizio cannot be held liable for the tort of trespass to land because he is an employee of Silk Nights.
D) Fabrizio was entitled to use reasonable force to resist Susana's efforts to remove him from the premises.
E) Susana,as a security guard,generally has the same rights and responsibilities as a police officer.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q55: Your friend Rahim owns a convenience store
Q56: After enjoying a meal on the outdoor
Q57: In R v Asante-Mensah,the Supreme Court of
Q58: Like many students,Dahlia has financial problems.And like
Q59: Dylan owns a piano store and is
Q61: Herman has committed the tort of trespass
Q62: The Sports Gambling Network (SGN)is a network
Q63: Seamus sat drinking in Kitty's Bar for
Q64: Serge quickly left a busy sporting goods
Q74: Identify, explain, and compare the different torts
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents