Suki used her property in a way that interfered with the ability of her neighbour,Dick,to enjoy his property.If that interference is sufficiently severe,Suki may be held liable even if her actions in interfering with her neighbour's ability to enjoy his property were not unreasonable.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In tort law, specifically in nuisance claims, the interference must be both substantial and unreasonable for the property owner to be held liable.

Suki Used Her Property in a Way That Interfered with the Ability