Ocala Corp operated a factory that caused corrosive particles to drift in the air and land on a building that was owned by Broderick Inc.Those particles damaged the roof of the building.The damage could have been repaired immediately at a cost of $250 000,but Broderick did not have the money necessary to do so.It therefore sued Ocala in negligence.By the time the trial ended several years later,inflation had run rampant and the cost of repairing Broderick's roof has increased to $900 000.Because of the modern approach to the "thin wallet" rule,Ocala cannot possibly be held liable for more than $250 000.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Careless statements are different than careless acts
Q1: Jane carelessly caused an accident that resulted
Q3: Omikron Ltd hired Mekhi,a recent graduate from
Q4: Maritza suffered a heart attack after consuming
Q4: As a general rule, liability cannot be
Q5: Alpha Corp recently suffered two losses.First,as a
Q6: Maura was injured by the unexpected explosion
Q10: Chantal has sued Phi Corp for negligence.Which
Q11: Shakira was injured by the explosion of
Q11: The courts use the test of reasonable
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents