Andreas has sued Kathryn for negligence.Kathryn argues that she did not owe a duty of care to Andreas.Which of the following statements is TRUE?
A) The court cannot recognize a duty of care if Andreas was injured as a result of Kathryn's omission,rather than by her action.
B) The court may refuse to recognize a duty of care even if it was reasonably foreseeable that Andreas might be injured as a result of Kathryn's carelessness,on grounds that public policy does not permit the extension of the duty of care to this relationship.
C) A court may recognize a duty of care even if it was not reasonably foreseeable that Andreas might be injured as a result of Kathryn's carelessness.
D) The court cannot recognize a duty of care if Kathryn was Andreas's mother.
E) The court cannot recognize a duty of care if Andreas and Kathryn were parties to the same contract.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Jane carelessly caused an accident that resulted
Q4: As a general rule, liability cannot be
Q10: Chantal has sued Phi Corp for negligence.Which
Q11: The courts use the test of reasonable
Q12: Aisha suffered a stroke after consuming allergy
Q14: After paying a price of $50,Mustaffa jumped
Q15: The defence of contributory negligence may apply
Q16: Danica was injured as a result of
Q17: In determining whether or not the defendant
Q18: Luke sued Michelle for negligence.In formulating the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents