The Town of Sussex Corner owned a bridge.Ruby negligently damaged the bridge by ramming it with a boat.At that point,it would have cost $30 000 to repair the bridge.Before the town could do so,however,Oswald negligently rammed the bridge in a different spot with his own boat.The town had the damage from both incidents repaired at the same time for a total cost of $50 000.Which of the following statements is TRUE?
A) Oswald's conduct falls under the heading of contributory negligence.
B) Sussex Corner has the option of recovering $50 000 from either Ruby or Oswald.
C) Ruby and Oswald are jointly and severally liable for the full loss.
D) Ruby will not be held liable at all because Oswald's negligence is an intervening act.
E) Oswald may be held liable for some damages even though Ruby had already damaged the bridge.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q31: The concept of a crumbling skull
A)does not
Q32: Which of the following statements most accurately
Q33: Chyna acted as Evan's accountant.In the course
Q34: The Iota Corp sued Araceli for negligence.It
Q35: The concept of remoteness
A)arises for consideration under
Q37: Which of the following statements is TRUE
Q38: Oprah suffered a broken collarbone as a
Q39: You work as a risk management advisor
Q40: Which of the following statements is TRUE
Q41: Which of the following statements is TRUE?
A)Contributory
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents