Asha sells bottled spring water.Unlike other water vendors who purify their water,Asha is marketing her product to those who want to drink spring water in its natural state.Although her water source is pure and clean,she is concerned that some consumers might have allergic reactions to trace elements in the unpurified water,so she designs a clause to exclude her company from liability.The clause indicates that,by opening and drinking the water,consumers are indicating that they have read and understood the warning that the water has not been purified and,as such,waive all liability claims against the company for any allergic reactions resulting from drinking the water.Which of the following is most likely TRUE of Asha's strategy?
A) It will fail because it is never possible to exclude tort liability by way of contract.
B) It will only succeed if the distributor personally points out to the consumer that by drinking the water they are waiving their right to sue.
C) It will succeed as long as the label on the bottle constitutes reasonable notice of the exclusion clause.
D) The exclusion clause must be written in reasonably clear language that makes it relevant to the liability to be excluded in order for the exclusion clause to be effective.
E) Exclusion clauses are not enforceable in a court of law.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q46: Justice Howe, a member of the Supreme
Q50: The BEST way for a company to
Q52: Molly decides to sell her house by
Q53: Which of the following statements is TRUE
Q54: Preetpal purchased a ticket to ride on
Q55: Tyra is looking to buy her first
Q59: Which of the following statements is TRUE
Q60: An exception to the parol evidence rule
Q61: Petros is the sole proprietor of a
Q65: Name a shortcoming of the literal approach
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents