Which of the following is sufficient written evidence to satisfy the Statute of Frauds in most Canadian jurisdictions?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In most Canadian jurisdictions, the Statute of Frauds requires that certain types of contracts be in writing and signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought. This is to prevent fraud and perjury in the enforcement of obligations depending for their evidence on the unassisted memory of witnesses. The types of contracts that typically fall under the Statute of Frauds include contracts for the sale of land, contracts that cannot be performed within one year, and suretyship agreements, among others.
A signed IOU (I Owe You), even if written on a napkin, could potentially satisfy the Statute of Frauds as long as it contains the essential terms of the agreement and is signed by the party that is being charged with the obligation. The signature indicates that the person has agreed to the terms written on the document, which provides written evidence of the contract.
The other options provided do not meet the requirements of the Statute of Frauds because they lack signatures (B, C, D, and E), which are necessary to bind the parties to the agreement. Without a signature, there is no formal acknowledgment by the party that they agree to the terms, making it difficult to enforce the contract under the Statute of Frauds.

Which of the Following Is Sufficient Written Evidence to Satisfy