According to Minnesota v.Dickerson (1993) ,if a patdown reveals identifiable contraband it may
A) not be seized
B) be seized only with a warrant
C) be seized on the spot
D) be seized only if it was in plain view
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q23: For consent to search to be valid,it
Q24: Under most circumstances,when an arresting officer has
Q25: A _ is an individual who is
Q26: A prerequisite to a legal plain-view search
Q27: Hot pursuit
A)limits searches to plain view
B)allows searches
Q29: For a "plain feel" Terry search to
Q30: Exceptions to the search warrant requirement are
Q31: School officials need _ _ to justify
Q32: A warrant is necessary for arrest
A)when there
Q33: In order to validly consent to a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents