In the case of Arizona et al.v.United States (2012), which of the following legal principles explains the Supreme Court's ruling that federal law shall supersede attempts by the state to regulate immigration?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Supreme Court's ruling in Arizona et al. v. United States was based on the supremacy clause, which establishes that federal law prevails over state law in instances where they conflict. In this case, the Court found that Arizona's efforts to regulate immigration encroached on the federal government's authority over the subject, and therefore were preempted by federal law.

In the Case of Arizona Et Al