Which of the following is a judicial philosophy whose adherents refuse to go beyond the text of the Constitution in interpreting its meaning?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Judicial restraint is a judicial philosophy that emphasizes the importance of adhering closely to the text of the Constitution and other laws, and limiting the power of judges to interpret those laws. Adherents of this philosophy avoid making decisions based on personal or political views, and instead focus on the facts of the case and the text of the law. This approach is often contrasted with judicial activism, which is more willing to go beyond the text of the law in the interest of promoting social or political goals.

Which of the Following Is a Judicial Philosophy Whose Adherents