In the 1991 Case of Masson V

In the 1991 case of Masson v.New Yorker Magazine, the Supreme Court held that fabricated quotations attributed to a public figure were libelous only when the

A) reporter was unable to produce a copy of the interview notes.
B) reporter was unable to produce an audio recording of the interview.
C) defamed individual was proven to have experienced actual harm as a direct result of the printed story.
D) fabricated quotations harmed the public interest.
E) fabricated quotations materially changed the meaning of what was actually said.